<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four week forecast part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportinggnomes.com/four-week-forecast-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportinggnomes.com/four-week-forecast-part-2/</link>
	<description>Roaming the Wide World of Clemson Sports</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clem</title>
		<link>http://sportinggnomes.com/four-week-forecast-part-2/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Clem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportinggnomes.com/four-week-forecast-part-2/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>There is an argument on scout.com right now as to who has the worse special teams, GT or Clemson with both teams chipping in on their own being worse.  If that is the case, look for an interesting game with short field positions for both teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an argument on scout.com right now as to who has the worse special teams, GT or Clemson with both teams chipping in on their own being worse.  If that is the case, look for an interesting game with short field positions for both teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
